Spooky":1xfnumf6 said:I didn't mean it's a bad thing to use a pre-made engine; saying that would make me a hypocrite. It's the fact that at no point has he given the slightest indication that he's using a program so aptly called RPG MAKER. It's not required for him to do so, I'm pretty sure, but I think he doesn't want to share the fact that the base of his game and -- at this point -- a lot of his resources, can be acquired by anyone for sixty bucks.
If he were straight with everyone, I would be able to accept this easier. Right now it just seems sort of wrong, even if it really isn't.
That being said, I agree with regi; the OST is good, but the graphics seem sort of cheesy.
Amy Pond":1nyfv14j said:$8,000 really doesn't get you much graphics wise, especially if you're paying the graphical artists fairly for their work.
I almost died laughing.paying the graphical artists fairly
I think his soul was the $500 donation prize.dinnerordie17":3dir6klm said:Hmm... good for him but those rewards you get for donating: weapons naming, npc naming, town naming, mary sueing.... it sounds like he had to sell its soul a bit.
Amy Pond":33y77a6g said:Some people just have that kind of money to spend on little things like this, I guess. Which isn't a bad thing at all; I'd personally find something better before spending that much though!
Foreverwhere":1rqpwpxz said:Spooky":1rqpwpxz said:I didn't mean it's a bad thing to use a pre-made engine; saying that would make me a hypocrite. It's the fact that at no point has he given the slightest indication that he's using a program so aptly called RPG MAKER. It's not required for him to do so, I'm pretty sure, but I think he doesn't want to share the fact that the base of his game and -- at this point -- a lot of his resources, can be acquired by anyone for sixty bucks.
If he were straight with everyone, I would be able to accept this easier. Right now it just seems sort of wrong, even if it really isn't.
That being said, I agree with regi; the OST is good, but the graphics seem sort of cheesy.
I understand what you are saying, Spooky, and your point is valid, but that would be like saying a company like SquareEnix would be obliged (not required) to reveal that it was using Unity3D instead of Crystal (or whatever their homebrew engine is), and then have to justify getting $10,000,000 from investors when Unity3D costs like $500.
That $8000 may have gone to those cheesy 3D gaphics, or to the music, instead of lining his pockets.
Or maybe the designer has a Kia now. :P
Anyway, what you are saying makes sense from an emotional standpoint, but is completely illogical from a business standpoint. If you can get money from investors (fans) and are not lying (withholding information is not lying) to them, then it's all okay.
Now if you take their money and don't deliver, or deliver pure crap, then ya...you're in the wrong.
It feels like I am in the process of climbing a gigantic wall. If I look up, all I see is more wall. If I look down, I see how far I have come. I can't just let go, so I have to keep climbing higher and higher and sometime (soonish would be nice) in the future when I look up I will see the top. It is exhausting, but at the same time a lot of fun. Creating this game is the perfect mix of art, music, technical know-how, and problem-solving abilities. As much as people are looking forward to playing the game, I am looking forward to completing it.
Yeah, you need to stop making new user names specifically just to bother me with minute details of which are of no consequence to anyone but you (and I garauntee you I understand the EULA far better than you - obviously I do otherwise you wouldn't be pestering me with such garbage).
I don't know why you feel the need to waste your time with this. I am sorry you made a pokemon fan game with RPG Maker and nobody liked it or whatever, but that is not my problem. Do not contact me any further.
Spooky":2xcb2byt said:Apparently this guy has a degree in English. Funny how he misspells words, makes grammar mistakes, and has generally flawed logic. I'm not saying he's a fraud based on this -- it's the internet, spell things how you want -- but I do think his defensiveness on the topic confirms my theory that he doesn't want people to know he's using RMVX for his "masterpiece."
Anyways, sorry for starting up my anger mode again; I read his response and thought it was pretty funny.
BlueScope":1h7sxlxb said:Whichever floats the boat, I say... and there really is no loser here, because noone got ripped off - there were no promises made that it's 100% self made.